Unit 9 Management Accounting Solution

 

Unit 9 Management Accounting Solution

Introduction

Unit 9 Management Accounting Solution

The Management Accounting Solution talks about the costs that the organisation has incurred in the past, present, and future. It also goes through the various methods for keeping track of inventories. Various cost variances are determined in the assignment by comparing them to the real budget to determine their impact on the business. Management accounting also comprises a number of budgets that may be compared to real business results. The assignment also discusses various costing and budgeting systems, as well as the causes of variation. It also goes through several corrective actions that will aid the company strategy’s process improvement.

Task 2

2.1 Prepare and analyses routine costs report by carrying out a variance analysis for ABC Ltd.

Production unit variance- The ABC LTD. produced 1000 more units than the budgeted amount. Manufacturing the 2000 units cost $9.05 per unit, which climbed to $9.06 per unit. The per unit cost did not change significantly, but the corporation may have decreased the per unit cost by exercising efficient cost management.

Unit 9 Management Accounting Solution

Sales revenue grew by $10,000 due to an increase in the number of manufacturing units produced by the firm. In compared to the cost of manufacturing the extra unit, there was not much of an increase in income.

Direct material – The per unit cost of material utilised during the manufacture was budgeted at $3. The actual material cost per unit was $2.83. As a result, the firm has made the best use of its raw materials (Miao, Xu, Qiu, Qing & Tao, 2015).

Direct labour – The anticipated per unit labour cost was 2, while the actual cost was 2.83, which was much greater than the budgeted amount. As a result, the corporation must make an attempt to lower its per-unit labour cost.

Maintenance cost- The change in maintenance cost was $400, which was not much greater than the plan’s estimates.

Depreciation-

Depreciation- The adjustment in depreciation cost was 200, which is not excessive when compared to the budgeted amount.

Rent and rates – The rent and rates both increased by 100, so the cost established in the budget hasn’t changed significantly.

Insurance – The cost of insurance was increased by $1400, which was substantially greater than what was originally planned (Pilleboue, Singh, Coeurjolly, Kazhdan & Ostromoukhov, 2015).

2.2 Use performance indicators to identify potential improvements for ABC Ltd.

Production variance – The production variance was negative since the extra unit provided no advantage to the firm.

The revenue per unit was 10 in the budget and 10 in the reality, thus there was no consequence.

Direct material- There was a positive variation since the per unit cost was lower than the budgeted amount.

Direct labour costs were negative since they increased significantly from the budgeted amount, reducing the budget’s income.

Maintenance cost variance- The maintenance cost variation is beneficial since it is not much higher than the budgeted budget.

Depreciation- The depreciation cost variance was likewise positive because there were little modifications from the projected budget (Ray & Jenamani, 2015).

Rent and rates – the rent and rates did not differ much from the budgeted amounts, thus the variance is beneficial.

Insurance- The actual cost of insurance was substantially more than the established budget, resulting in a negative variance.

2.3 Suggest improvements to reduce costs; enhance value and quality to the ABC Ltd management accounting information.

 

Added value – The difference between the selling price of a product and the direct and indirect inputs utilised to make that product is known as added value. The projected profit of ABC ltd. was 1900, while the actual profit was 6800, indicating that the firm earned a bigger profit than the anticipated profit. To lower manufacturing costs, the corporation must make an attempt to cut labour costs as well as insurance costs (Jena, 2016).To increase the quality of the output, total quality management needs the use of strategy, data, and communication. TQM requires all members of the organisation to engage in improving the company’s existing processes in order to increase the quality of the final product. TQM’s main principles include

 

Employee participation

Customer-centered

Process-oriented

System integration

Improvement throughout time

Communication for Making Informed Decisions

Approach that is systematic and strategic

Task 4

4.1 Calculate variances for month 2, identify possible causes and recommend corrective action.

From the data given in the question following variances can be calculated

Material variance

 

Material variance: standard cost – actual cost

                                  672000-660000 = £12000 (favorable)

 

Material price variance: standard cost of actual quantity-actual cost

                                          720000-660000=£60000 (favorable)

 

Material usage variance: Standard cost of standard quantity for actual production- standard cost of actual quantity

                                              (11200-12000) X 60= £48000 (unfavorable)

Causes and recommendations:A positive material variance indicates that the material is being used effectively in the organisation. It is demonstrated that by eliminating waste, the material may be used more efficiently.

Variation in labour

 

Standard cost – actual cost 288000-303360 = £15360 laborvariance (unfavorable)

 

Variation in labour rates: real cost – standard cost of actual time 284400-303360 = 18960 (unfavorable)

 

Standard cost of standard time for real output – standard cost of actual time 288000-270000= 18000 (favorable)

 

Difference between real hours paid and actual hours worked at regular rate 284400-270000= 14400 hours of idle time (unfavorable)

Causes and recommendations:Labor variation is undesirable and can be caused by expensive labour availability; however, it can be rectified via effective training and efficient labour use (Roper & Ruckes, 2012).

 

Overhead variance is variable.




Total variation in variable overhead: Actual variable overhead vs. standard variable overhead

 

480000-480000= 0




Actual hours X variable overhead expense variation ( standard rate- actual rate)

 

15800 X (30-30.38) = 6000 (unfavorable)




Standard rate X (standard hours – actual hours) is a variable overhead efficiency variation.

 

30 X (16000-15800) = 6000 (favourable) (favorable)




Causes and recommendations: Variable expenditures can be minimised by utilising resources properly.




Overhead lighting




Variation in fixed overhead expenditures: planned vs. actual overheads

 

210000-200000= 10000 (favorable)




absorbed fixed overhead – planned fixed overheads = fixed overhead volume variance

 

207375-210000= 2625 (unfavorable)

Causes and recommendation

As fixed overhead variance is favorable it can be said that overhead are incurred efficiently

Sales variance

 

Sales price variance: actual sales – standard sales

                         1800000- (8000X240) = 120000 (unfavorable)

 

Sales volume variance: standard sales- budgeted sales

                     1920000- (8400X240) =96000 (unfavorable)

 

Causes and recommendation:Unfavorable variance of sales volume depicts that sales target are not achieved from the budgeted sales. It can be improved by proper training of the sales persons and by proper marketing schemes (Jamaludin, Shariffah, Mohammad & Ahmad, 2014).

Sales margin variance:

 

Sales margin price variance: Actual margin – Standard margin

                                            356640-448000=91360 (unfavorable)

 

Sales margin volume variance: Standard margin – budgeted margin

                                               448000-504000= 56000 (unfavorable)